The controversial portion on 1Timothy is Paul’s letter to Timothy regarding general principles on
how individuals and churches should conduct themselves in a manner pleasing to
God. There is no indication that this particular portion is talking about how
men and women should function during a church service. I believe that Paul here
is mentioning general principles on how men and women should walk in a manner
befitting the Lord. Men are called to pray more and women are called to be more
modest. In those lines, Paul further deals with the conduct of women and says
that women as a rule are not called to boss over men. Now surely the opposite
cannot be inferred which is that men can boss over women. However, the general
principle is clear. Women were not created first and therefore it is men who
have been given more of leadership qualities. He goes on to say that the woman
fell most probably because she failed to even think of consulting with her
husband. Now the fact that the husband gave in without a thought is another matter.
But her problem was that she had decided in her mind to eat before she
actually ate of it. Her mind was settled. She was thoroughly deceived. She ate
and then gave to her husband. The final point in verse 15 which Paul then makes is that
women should practice self-restraint which will surely help them to move on in
their salvation journey. I also would add that the self-restraint should be in
speech, more than anything else!
Total Pageviews
Saturday, June 21, 2014
Wednesday, June 4, 2014
Tongues is not a cure for all ills!
I had an interesting journey recently in a van with some believers whom I did not know personally. After some time, two of them went to the back of the van and began using the gift of tongues in a most casual way. I found it strange because they were not directing it to God but almost using it as a chant and doing it like they were gaining some points from a game. It set me thinking as to how the gift of tongues is being practiced and taught in certain circles. It is being taught that since tongues cannot be understood by the mind, a more pure form of prayer is taking place and sanctification happens at a much faster pace. In other words, a person praying in tongues grows faster spiritually because his prayer is more accurate.
The problem I have is not with tongues per se but the fact that it seems to be taught as the answer to everything. I pray with the mind and I pray with the spirit. I sing with the mind and I sing with the spirit. I do not think that one is an improved version of the other. We cannot replace one with the other. The devil is not more scared of tongues than of languages. Tongues do not awaken the angels more. Our mind being switched off is not always necessary. Sometimes, to think through our prayers is more edifying. It all depends on the situation we are in. When we are in tune with the Holy Spirit, He has the freedom to speak to our mind or to bypass our mind. Both are equally edifying. The only difference I believe is that we are easily distracted when we pray with the mind but praying with the spirit can extend our prayer times. We can pray more and that is a definite advantage but let us not deify tongues. We can use tongues more and still be very carnal. Let us beware of moving out of grace into a gospel of works.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)